Sarah Guo's 2025 AI Vision: Prompts Are Flawed, Execution is the Moat
Rose Sun
6
8-4Mia: You know, we've all gotten used to this idea of 'prompting' an AI, like we're all becoming expert prompt engineers. But what if that entire interaction model is actually a bug, not a feature?
Mars: I love that framing. It's a powerful idea from Sarah Guo, the VC and host of the No Priors podcast. She recently shared her vision for AI in 2025, and it really challenges some common assumptions.
Mia: Right. Her first big point is that the future isn't about getting better at writing prompts; it's about making the prompt box disappear entirely. But what's even more surprising is her take on who's actually adopting this new tech.
Mars: That's the part that's fascinating. It challenges the common perception that cutting-edge tech is always adopted first by the most tech-savvy sectors. What's driving this leapfrog effect she talks about in traditional industries?
Mia: Exactly. It seems the AI Leapfrog Effect means industries with less established tech infrastructure might be more open to integrating AI solutions from the ground up, rather than trying to retrofit clunky, existing systems. Mars, what does this imply for startups targeting these traditionally overlooked sectors?
Mars: Oh, it's a massive opportunity. You're not just selling a feature; you're selling a whole new, more efficient way of working. You get to define their entire tech stack, which is a much stickier and more valuable position to be in than just being another plug-in.
Mia: So, the core message is to focus on abstracting away complexity for users and to look for opportunities in those surprising traditional sectors. But before we dive deeper into those specific industries, let's first understand why AI coding became such a breakthrough area in the first place.
Mars: A great starting point. It’s really the blueprint for success.
Mia: Well, Sarah Guo identified coding as AI's first breakthrough application. She attributes this to code being a structured, verifiable language, heavily prioritized by researchers, and, most importantly, built by engineers who deeply understand their own workflows.
Mars: That makes so much sense. The fact that engineers built tools for themselves, understanding the pain points intimately, is a powerful advantage. It's like they were their own first and most critical user.
Mia: Absolutely. And this leads to her core thesis: The ultimate winners will not just be AI experts who have learned a domain, but rather practitioners who are customer-centric and problem-oriented. Mars, how does this insight directly translate into building the next big AI application, moving beyond coding tools?
Mars: It means the next big thing probably won't come from a pure AI lab. It'll come from a lawyer, a doctor, or a logistics manager who gets frustrated and says, There has to be a better way, and then uses AI to build that better way. It’s about creating these thick product experiences that are deeply embedded in how people actually work, not just a chatbot in the corner of the screen.
Mia: So, the lesson from coding is clear: deep domain understanding and a focus on workflow integration are key. This naturally leads us to consider other sectors. Sarah mentioned that traditional industries are surprisingly fast adopters – what specific fields are seeing this AI Leapfrog Effect, and where should we be looking for the next major AI breakthroughs?
Mars: This is where it gets really interesting.
Mia: She highlighted a surprising trend: traditional industries like customer service, legal, and healthcare are rapidly adopting AI, a phenomenon she calls the AI Leapfrog Effect, with companies like Sierra, Harvey, and OpenEvidence achieving huge traction.
Mars: It's counterintuitive, but it makes sense if you think about how much room for improvement there is in those less tech-saturated fields. They're basically starting with a blanker slate, so they can jump straight to the best solution.
Mia: Precisely. And she also pointed out that the Copilot model, which enhances human capabilities, is still really undervalued. Mars, her Iron Man suit analogy is quite powerful. What's the key strategic advantage of building this power suit first, rather than aiming for full automation immediately?
Mars: The Iron Man suit is the perfect analogy because it's all about building trust and managing user tolerance. People are much more forgiving of an AI assistant that makes a suggestion than a fully autonomous system that makes a critical error. You build the power suit first, let users feel empowered, gather incredible data on their workflows, and then you can gradually increase autonomy as the AI gets smarter and that trust is solidified.
Mia: So, the strategy is to build powerful augmentation tools first, then gradually increase autonomy. This brings us to the final, critical point: what truly constitutes a competitive moat in the AI era, and how can builders maintain their edge?
Mars: The million-dollar, or rather, billion-dollar question.
Mia: Well, Sarah Guo's final key insight is that in the AI era, the real competitive moat is simply excellent execution, combined with taste and effort, rather than proprietary models. Companies like Cursor won by delivering superior user experiences and intelligent orchestration.
Mars: So, it's about building a really well-crafted product that users love and trust, even if the underlying tech is becoming commoditized. The user experience itself becomes the key differentiator. It's not what model you use, but how you use it to solve a real problem.
Mia: Exactly. It’s the mastery of the user experience and workflow integration that builds the moat. Sarah Guo's insights paint a picture of immense opportunity, especially for those who focus on deep domain expertise and exceptional execution. So, if we had to boil this all down, what are the key principles for someone building in AI today?
Mars: I think it comes down to four things. First, stop thinking of the prompt as a feature—it's a bug to be solved. Make it invisible. Second, look for opportunities in the most unexpected, traditional places; that's the AI Leapfrog Effect. Third, don't underestimate the power of the Copilot model to augment humans before you try to replace them. And finally, and maybe most importantly, remember that execution is the moat. A brilliant product will always beat a slightly better model.