Student Teachers on Higher Ed Assessment: Driving Growth and Real-World Skills
Moleboheng Nkaluse
1
10-17David: When you think back to university, what's the first thing that comes to mind when you hear the word assessment? For me, it's the image of a giant exam hall, dead silent, just the sound of pens scratching on paper, trying to recall every single date and formula I'd crammed the night before.
Sarah: Oh, absolutely. That high-pressure, memory-dump model was the standard for so long. But what's fascinating is how that picture is becoming almost archaic. We're in the middle of this huge shift in higher education where assessment is being completely reimagined.
David: Right, it feels like it's moving away from just what do you know? to something more complex. What's driving that?
Sarah: Well, it's really about aligning education with reality. Universities are under pressure to prepare students for actual careers, not just for academic life. So assessments are now designed to measure skills that matter in the workplace: problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. It's a move from recall to readiness.
David: That makes sense. So instead of just a final exam, you’re seeing more things like group projects or case studies?
Sarah: Exactly. Things like portfolios, practicals, case studies... these aren't just trendy teaching methods. They're a direct response to what employers are asking for. They want graduates who can walk in and tackle a complex problem, not just recite a textbook. It's a fundamental shift in the goal of education itself. We're not building human databases anymore; we're trying to cultivate problem-solvers.
David: I see. So it's very much a pragmatic, workforce-driven evolution. But I have to ask, is there a potential downside here? By focusing so heavily on these real-world skills, are we at risk of losing something important? Like, de-emphasizing foundational knowledge or the ability to synthesize huge amounts of information, which those old-school exams were actually pretty good at testing.
Sarah: That's a great point, and it’s all about balance. No one is saying foundational knowledge is irrelevant. You can't critically think about a subject you know nothing about. The idea isn't to replace knowledge, but to see it as the starting point, not the destination. The modern approach asks, Okay, you have the knowledge. Now what can you do with it? It's about making that knowledge active, not passive.
David: So, it’s about building a more complete, future-proof graduate, even if it means juggling these different educational priorities. This actually leads perfectly into the next layer: how do these big goals actually show up in the classroom? I know we hear terms like formative and summative assessment thrown around a lot.
Sarah: Yes, and understanding the difference is key to understanding modern teaching. Think of it this way: summative assessment is the big final exam or the final project. It happens at the end, and it’s meant to evaluate your overall achievement. It's the sum of your learning.
David: Okay, that's the one we're all familiar with. The big, scary final.
Sarah: Right. But formative assessment is, in many ways, more important for the actual learning process. It’s all the stuff that happens along the way—quizzes, in-class activities, feedback on a draft, reflections. Its purpose isn't to give you a final grade, but to give you and the instructor information on how you're doing right now, so you can adjust.
David: I see. So it's more of a diagnostic tool during the process.
Sarah: Precisely. And the magic happens when you connect the two through a strong feedback loop. Good formative assessment gives you the insights you need to improve before you get to that high-stakes summative assessment. It's not just about judging performance; it's about actively improving it. Research consistently shows that students who get regular, detailed formative feedback perform significantly better on their final evaluations.
David: That feedback loop is a great way to put it. Could you maybe give us an analogy to make it even clearer? How do they work together as a system?
Sarah: Of course. Think of preparing a sports team for a championship. The summative assessment is the championship game itself—that’s the final measure of performance. But you would never get there without all the practice sessions, the drills, the strategy talks with the coach, and watching tapes of your performance. All of that is formative assessment. It's the continuous coaching and practice that makes you ready for the big game. One without the other just doesn't work.
David: That’s a brilliant analogy. It really clarifies the roles. From a student's perspective, though, how do they feel different? I imagine one is a source of constant anxiety, and the other... maybe less so?
Sarah: You've hit on a crucial point. A final exam, the summative one, often brings a lot of stress because it feels so final. All the weight is on that one performance. Formative assessment, when done well, should feel supportive. It's low-stakes. A bad quiz score isn't a disaster; it's a signal. It tells you, Hey, you need to focus more on this area. It lowers the fear of failure and reframes mistakes as learning opportunities.
David: So it's clear both are essential, and that feedback is the glue that holds it all together. But how does this all translate when you're thrown into a truly immersive, real-world learning environment? Let's talk about something like teaching practice for student teachers. That feels like the ultimate test.
Sarah: It really is. Teaching practice is the crucible where all this theory gets tested by fire. You're not just answering questions anymore; you're managing a live classroom, designing lessons from scratch, and dealing with unpredictable situations in real time. It's assessment in its most authentic form.
David: And it sounds like it’s way more than just being observed and graded. The source material describes it as a transformative experience.
Sarah: It is, because it's where assessment truly becomes an opportunity for growth. You’re forced to adapt constantly. But what makes it work, what makes it a learning experience instead of just a terrifying trial, is the mentorship. Having a supervising teacher who provides guidance and creates a safe environment is everything.
David: A safe environment? What does that mean in this context?
Sarah: It means you have the psychological safety to experiment. To try a new teaching technique and maybe have it not work perfectly, but you can do so without the fear of catastrophic failure or harsh judgment. The mentor is there to help you reflect on what went wrong, what went right, and what you'll do differently tomorrow. That immediate, constructive feedback loop is what accelerates your professional development at an incredible rate.
David: That makes perfect sense. But the materials also mention challenges, like time constraints. I can imagine a busy supervising teacher doesn't have hours to sit and debrief. How do you make sure the feedback is still meaningful under that kind of pressure?
Sarah: That's the art of it. It relies on being very intentional. It might mean focusing on just one or two key takeaways after a lesson, rather than a full laundry list of critiques. It might involve structured reflection journals that the student teacher fills out, to guide their own thinking. It’s about making every piece of feedback concise, actionable, and forward-looking, so it fosters real growth, not just compliance.
David: It sounds like this kind of experiential learning really reshapes a person. Which brings us to a bigger, more philosophical point. If assessment can be this transformative, what's its ultimate purpose, beyond just assigning a grade?
Sarah: This is the most important question. Ultimately, assessment shouldn't be a finish line; it should be a launchpad for lifelong learning. The goal is to internalize that process of feedback and reflection. It's about developing the ability to self-assess, to identify your own strengths and weaknesses, and to know how to improve. Those are the skills that will serve you for your entire career, long after you've forgotten the content of any single exam.
David: That's a powerful vision. But let's be realistic—for many students, and for the system itself, assessment is still about the final grade. The GPA. How do we bridge that gap? How can educators shift the student mindset away from just chasing marks to actually embracing this idea of assessment for growth?
Sarah: It’s a huge challenge, and it requires a cultural shift. It starts with how educators frame their assignments. By making the learning objectives clear, providing transparent rubrics that reward process and reflection—not just the final product—and by celebrating improvement. It's about consistently sending the message that learning is the goal, and the grade is just a byproduct of that process. When students see that you genuinely care about their development, they start to care too.
David: And if we look at it from an employer's point of view, what do they find more valuable? The student with the perfect 4.0 GPA, or the student who can show a portfolio of projects where they failed, reflected, and improved?
Sarah: Increasingly, it's the latter. A GPA is a single data point. A portfolio tells a story. It shows resilience, adaptability, and a capacity for growth. An employer would much rather hire someone who knows how to learn from their mistakes than someone who is terrified of making them. That's what demonstrates a true growth mindset, and that’s what makes a valuable employee in a world that’s constantly changing.
David: So, as we wrap up, it seems we've landed on a few core ideas. The first is that the entire purpose of assessment is changing, moving away from simple memory tests.
Sarah: Exactly. It’s now about holistically measuring the skills that actually matter for the future, like critical thinking and problem-solving, all driven by what the real world demands.
David: And the second key point is the machinery behind it. It's not just about one final exam, but this powerful, synergistic relationship between ongoing, developmental feedback and that final evaluation.
Sarah: Right, that's the feedback loop. The synergy between formative and summative assessment is what turns evaluation from a judgment into a genuine learning tool.
David: And finally, when you put all of this into an immersive, real-world scenario like teaching practice, that's where the magic really happens.
Sarah: That’s it. That’s the transformative arena. It combines challenge, mentorship, and self-reflection, and it moves assessment beyond a grade to become a true foundation for professional and personal growth.
David: Ultimately, assessment in higher education is far more than a bureaucratic hurdle or a mere grading exercise. When conceived and executed thoughtfully, it transforms into a powerful philosophical tool – a compass guiding individual growth, a mirror reflecting evolving capabilities, and a catalyst for cultivating the adaptable, lifelong learners our complex world demands. The challenge, and the profound opportunity, for educators and institutions alike, is to consistently elevate assessment from an endpoint to a perpetual beginning, fostering not just knowledge acquisition, but the wisdom to continuously learn, adapt, and thrive.